Won’t Work Will Hurt and It’s Un-Australian campaign websites: “Clubs Australia advocates a common sense and proven approach to assisting problem gamblers.”
Clubs Australia President Peter Newell’s National Press Club Address, 23/3/2011, about the government’s initial refusal to act on the 2010 Productivity Commission report: “Clubs Australia issued a statement to our member clubs and the media supporting the Government response and saying it was a victory for common sense, recognising that there is no silver bullet to problem gambling.”
Clubs Australia Chief Executive Anthony Ball, Clubs Australia media release, 1/9/2011: “Common sense and now the Salvation Army, says you don’t help a problem gambler by giving them a gambling card. To invoke a law to control the urge of a compulsive gambler is nonsense.”
Anthony Ball, Clubs Australia media release, 15/9/2011: “Mandatory pre-commitment simply won’t work. Common sense says you don’t help a problem gambler by giving them a card to continue their destructive gambling addiction.”
Anthony Ball on their anti-reform campaign, AFR, 14/10/2011: “We will focus most tightly in marginal seats. If MPs choose to vote for mandatory pre-commitment, as Andrew Wilkie wants them to do, then I can see clubs across the country reacting very poorly to that. We will continue our campaign until common sense prevails — be that before the election or after the next election.”
Anthony Ball, Clubs Australia media release, 21/10/2011: “It’s common sense that the problem gambler will be first in line for a licence and will set unrealistically high limits.”
Anthony Ball, Clubs Australia media release, 7/12/2011: “This is why clubs will continue to campaign against the expensive and experimental mandatory pre-commitment until common-sense prevails.”
Anthony Ball opposing Stop The Loss, 20/1/2012: “We will continue to put our message out there until common sense prevails.”
Get the picture? Clubs Australia’s perception of common sense has more to do with dollars and cents than anything else.
The latest incantation of “common sense” takes a different angle. Responding to the latest Senate report and a proposal to make venues more liable and responsible in situations where self-excluded gamblers continue to try and play poker machines, Clubs Australia spokesman Jeremy Bath countered by saying it would be better to extend the program to allow “concerned family members” to exclude problem gamblers. He said:
“Common sense says the person who is best able to detect a gambling problem is the person who knows you best, and that is always going to be a close family member.”
And this is what has got me furious.
We’ve all known people with gambling problems, or read the stories about the money lost, the crimes committed, the lives ruined. And the common thread to all of these stories?
“I didn’t know.”
“How could I have missed it?”
“I just didn’t see it.”
“How could I have been so blind?”
“I trusted him/her, and they let me down.”
“I didn’t know anything was wrong.”
“I never saw it coming.”
“I didn’t know.”
The sad truth of the matter is that love is blind. So often, our loved ones don’t see the warning signs because they’re not looking for them. They believe the lies because they want to, they need to… they have no reason not to. The little things, tell-tale signs that are glaringly obvious in hindsight, get lost in the hustle and bustle of everyday life.
I was in a stable relationship for all of the three years that I was addicted to poker machines. For much of that time, we were engaged. I lived in constant, daily fear of discovery and to my shame, I became one of the most accomplished liars I have ever known. But there were clues, hints, signs that things were not as they seemed. I could see them, I was sure that sooner or later my partner would too.
Right up until the day that everything came crashing down, she never suspected a thing.
That is the reality. Our family members, friends and loved ones, are often too close to see what is going on. More, they don’t want to. Having a partner, a parent, a child with a gambling problem doesn’t fit in with how we see our lives; it’s a reality that, once seen, cannot be unseen. So we ignore it, sometimes blindly, sometimes desperately, for as long as we can.
I’m not opposing this suggestion, not at all… but to throw the responsibility back not just to the gambler, but to their families, and then call it common sense is a bridge too far.
Common sense? If common sense was a reality then we would have no poker machine industry at all. Who in their right mind would waste even one dollar on a machine that can’t be influenced, can’t be swayed and is designed to win?
If common sense was a reality then the industry would admit that they target low-income areas because that’s where the money is, rather than waffling on about demographics and profit margins.
If common sense was a reality then the hundreds upon hundreds of poker machine venues in Australia would be falling over themselves to offer a safer, more responsible product, one where the chances of fostering addiction are greatly reduced.
So much for common sense.